Comments on: Episode 7 – Live PBS Recording on Web 2.0

By: ptvGuy

ptvGuy — Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:22:01 +0000

I wonder why neither Mike nor George mentioned Technorati when they were discussing “peer revue” and trying to find good content in among the whole mass of content. Technorati is “up to the minute” web content whereas Google can take weeks to months to notice something and applying PageRank can take even longer than that. Technorati also lets you sort results by relative authority and has its own ranking system.

By: Kerry Johnson

Kerry Johnson — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 02:53:43 +0000

I’d love to subscribe to this podcast, but it’s too difficult. I have Juice but can’t seem to load your URL into it. Help!

By: Andy Ford

Andy Ford — Tue, 30 May 2006 23:45:31 +0000

Michael, I thought you did a great job. It was a bummer that the callers just heard “MySpace” out of context and just called in to talk about MySpace.

@Ari – I didn’t get the feeling that Tom or Brian were talking down to listeners. For web junkies like us, yes Web2.0 is old news… But, to agree with Frank, I think the average listeners of the program probably aren’t people like us who eat, sleep, and breathe the internet and hang out at sites like these to post comments!

Thanks

By: Frank Gruber

Frank Gruber — Sat, 20 May 2006 19:32:45 +0000

Pretty basic info for those that are up on the subject but should be very useful for those that do not know much about this thing called Web 2.0.

Great job Mike on educating the masses.

By: Brad Hintze » Blog Archive » Traditional media hates bloggers

Brad Hintze » Blog Archive » Traditional media hates bloggers — Thu, 18 May 2006 15:09:57 +0000

[...] TalkCrunch has a recent episode redistributing a discussion about Web 2.0 on the KPBS show "These Days" between Tom Fudge, Brian Cooley (editor-at-lart at CNet) and Michael Arrington. It was hard for Brian to hide disdain for blogging and the new social community; immeidately he stated there is good content, but there is a huge amount of garbage. Michael’s response, I’m sure he gets this all the time, was perfect; the community will push the garbage to the edge and the good stuff will float to the top by its own virtue. Brian’s response “it’s like a big septic tank out there, stuff eventually begins to flow through”. But what do you expect from an editor of a traditional media organization? [...]

By: Ari Mir

Ari Mir — Wed, 17 May 2006 19:56:00 +0000

Michael,

This is off topic, but I didn’t know where else to post it.

I have noticed the frequency of your posts has gone down. Is this because there are fewer startups launching? Or have you raised the bar?

Good job on PBS. It was embarrassing how Tom Fudge and Brian Cooley talked down to the listeners, as if anyone really thinks Web 2.0 is a “new” web existing somewhere separately in cyberspace.

Thanks.

By: SAJE.blog » Blog Archive » Great PBS Podcast Discussing “Web 2.0″: What It Means, Why It’s Valuable

Mon, 15 May 2006 01:25:40 +0000

[...] Talkcrunch link [...]

By: Podcast about Web 2.0 at TalkCrunch - RotorBlog.com

Podcast about Web 2.0 at TalkCrunch - RotorBlog.com — Wed, 10 May 2006 10:31:52 +0000

[...] May Maris03:07 amAdd comment Today I was listening podcast from TalkCrunch – episode 7. [...]

By: Tegan

Tegan — Wed, 10 May 2006 09:16:16 +0000

Hi,

I read your comments on web2.0. I was wondering if you have visited Pageflakes (http://www.pageflakes.com) already? We are offering a similar service allowing you to read news feeds and setting up multiple pages that can be customized with local weather, address book, todo lists, event finders, TV guides and much more. Looking forward to hearing from you. Maybe you have some thoughts on what we can improve.

Thanks and best regards
Tegan